论文标题
Lora Beyond Aloha:对替代随机访问协议的调查
LoRa beyond ALOHA: An Investigation of Alternative Random Access Protocols
论文作者
论文摘要
我们提出了一个基于随机几何的模型,以研究洛万(Lorawan)的替代媒介访问选择---广泛采用的低功率宽区域网络(LPWAN)技术(IOT)。 Lorawan的采用是由其简化的网络体系结构,空气接口和中等访问驱动的。物理层被称为洛拉(Lora),通过扩散因子(SFS)和时能捕获增益提供准正交虚拟通道。但是,在可扩展性方面,采用的纯Aloha访问机制在相同渠道的同一SF传输中受到了大量设备的传输。在本文中,我们的目标是探索洛拉万(Lorawan)远离aloha的访问机制。利用洛拉(Lora)的时间和功率捕获效应的最新结果,我们开发了一个统一的模型,用于对其他选择的比较研究,即,aloha和carrier-sense多重访问(CSMA)。该模型包括这些访问机制的必要设计参数,例如guard时间和插入的Aloha的同步精度,CSMA的载波传感阈值。它还说明了CSMA的环形区域(Lora的特征)设备的空间相互作用。使用Monte-Carlo模拟验证了从覆盖率,通道吞吐量和能源效率方面衍生的性能。我们的分析表明,插入的Aloha确实比纯Aloha具有更高的可靠性,但以低设备密度的能源效率降低。而在可靠性和能源效率方面,CSMA的表现优于较小的SFS Aloha,其性能在较高的SFS处降至纯Aloha。
We present a stochastic geometry-based model to investigate alternative medium access choices for LoRaWAN---a widely adopted low-power wide-area networking (LPWAN) technology for the Internet-of-things (IoT). LoRaWAN adoption is driven by its simplified network architecture, air interface, and medium access. The physical layer, known as LoRa, provides quasi-orthogonal virtual channels through spreading factors (SFs) and time-power capture gains. However, the adopted pure ALOHA access mechanism suffers, in terms of scalability, under the same-channel same-SF transmissions from a large number of devices. In this paper, our objective is to explore access mechanisms beyond-ALOHA for LoRaWAN. Using recent results on time- and power-capture effects of LoRa, we develop a unified model for the comparative study of other choices, i.e., slotted ALOHA and carrier-sense multiple access (CSMA). The model includes the necessary design parameters of these access mechanisms, such as guard time and synchronization accuracy for slotted ALOHA, carrier sensing threshold for CSMA. It also accounts for the spatial interaction of devices in annular-shaped regions, characteristic of LoRa, for CSMA. The performance derived from the model in terms of coverage probability, channel throughput, and energy efficiency are validated using Monte-Carlo simulations. Our analysis shows that slotted ALOHA indeed has higher reliability than pure ALOHA but at the cost of lower energy efficiency for low device densities. Whereas, CSMA outperforms slotted ALOHA at smaller SFs in terms of reliability and energy efficiency, with its performance degrading to pure ALOHA at higher SFs.