论文标题
哪些论文引用了哪些推文？基于Scopus数据的经验分析
Which papers cited which tweets? An empirical analysis based on Scopus data
论文作者
论文摘要
许多高级研究分析了哪些论文被提及在特定高度源中的频率。为了从另一个角度研究推文的潜在政策相关性，我们研究了论文中引用了哪些推文。如果出版物中引用了许多推文，这可能表明推文具有大量和有用的内容。总体而言，少于3000篇论文引用了相当少的推文（n = 5506）。大多数推文似乎没有引用，因为他们可能对研究产生任何认知影响。他们宁愿是研究对象。引用推文的大多数论文来自社会科学，艺术和人文科学以及计算机科学领域。大多数论文仅引用了一条推文。在一张纸中发现了多达55个推文。这项进行的研究不支持高度的推文。但是，对推文和/或论文的内容分析可能会导致更详细的结论。
Many altmetric studies analyze which papers were mentioned how often in specific altmetrics sources. In order to study the potential policy relevance of tweets from another perspective, we investigate which tweets were cited in papers. If many tweets were cited in publications, this might demonstrate that tweets have substantial and useful content. Overall, a rather low number of tweets (n=5506) were cited by less than 3000 papers. Most tweets do not seem to be cited because of any cognitive influence they might have had on studies; they rather were study objects. Most of the papers citing tweets are from the subject areas Social Sciences, Arts and Humanities, and Computer Sciences. Most of the papers cited only one tweet. Up to 55 tweets cited in a single paper were found. This research-in-progress does not support a high policy-relevance of tweets. However, a content analysis of the tweets and/or papers might lead to a more detailed conclusion.
