论文标题

没有质量验证的虚假报告和防综合众包机制

A Misreport- and Collusion-Proof Crowdsourcing Mechanism without Quality Verification

论文作者

Li, Kun, Wang, Shengling, Cheng, Xiuzhen, Hu, Qin

论文摘要

质量控制在众包中起着至关重要的作用。最先进的工作不适合大规模的众包应用程序,因为请求者验证任务质量或以一对一模式选择专业工人是一个漫长的途径。在本文中,我们提出了一种错误的报告和防勾结众包机制,指导工人通过设计机制来真实地报告提交任务的质量,而无需勾结,以便工人必须按照请求者的方式行事。详细说明,请求者提出的机制没有空间使工人通过质量失误和勾结获得利润,因此,可以在没有任何验证的情况下控制质量。广泛的仿真结果验证了所提出的机制的有效性。最后,我们作品的重要性和独创性在于它揭示了一些有趣甚至违反直觉的发现:1)高质量的工人可能假装是一种低品质的; 2)高质量工人的任务质量的提高可能不会导致请求者的效用增加; 3)随着工人数量的增加,请求者的效用可能不会得到改善。这些发现可以提高向前外观和战略规划解决方案,以供众包。

Quality control plays a critical role in crowdsourcing. The state-of-the-art work is not suitable for large-scale crowdsourcing applications, since it is a long haul for the requestor to verify task quality or select professional workers in a one-by-one mode. In this paper, we propose a misreport- and collusion-proof crowdsourcing mechanism, guiding workers to truthfully report the quality of submitted tasks without collusion by designing a mechanism, so that workers have to act the way the requestor would like. In detail, the mechanism proposed by the requester makes no room for the workers to obtain profit through quality misreport and collusion, and thus, the quality can be controlled without any verification. Extensive simulation results verify the effectiveness of the proposed mechanism. Finally, the importance and originality of our work lie in that it reveals some interesting and even counterintuitive findings: 1) a high-quality worker may pretend to be a low-quality one; 2) the rise of task quality from high-quality workers may not result in the increased utility of the requestor; 3) the utility of the requestor may not get improved with the increasing number of workers. These findings can boost forward looking and strategic planning solutions for crowdsourcing.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源