论文标题
太阳能物理学计算工具的调查
A Survey of Computational Tools in Solar Physics
论文作者
论文摘要
Sunpy项目开发了13个疑问调查,以了解太阳能物理社区的软件和硬件使用情况。 35个国家 /地区的364个太阳能物理社区成员对我们的调查做出了回应。我们发现99美元$ \ pm $ 0.5%的受访者在他们的研究中使用软件,而66%的受访者使用Python Scientific Software Stack。学生使用Python而不是交互式数据语言(IDL)的可能性是教师,员工科学家和研究人员的两倍。在这方面,天体物理学和太阳能物理社区的差异很大:我们样本中有78%的太阳能物理学教师,员工科学家和研究人员使用IDL,而Momcheva和Tollerud(2015年)进行了44%的天体物理学教师和44%的科学家。 63 $ \ pm $ 4%的受访者没有在本科或研究生级别上任何计算机科学课程。我们还发现,大多数受访者都利用消费者硬件来运行用于太阳能物理研究的软件。尽管有82%的受访者使用来自太空或地面任务的数据,但其中一些(例如,太阳能动力学天文台和丹尼尔·K·伊诺耶太阳能望远镜)每天生产数据的数据,但14%使用区域性或国家集群,5%使用商业云提供者,使用29%的使用者,以及29%的使用laptop or Deskpop或Desktop。最后,我们发现73 $ \ pm $ 4%的受访者在他们的研究中引用了科学软件,尽管只有42美元$ \ pm $ 3%通常这样做。
The SunPy Project developed a 13-question survey to understand the software and hardware usage of the solar physics community. 364 members of the solar physics community, across 35 countries, responded to our survey. We found that 99$\pm$0.5% of respondents use software in their research and 66% use the Python scientific software stack. Students are twice as likely as faculty, staff scientists, and researchers to use Python rather than Interactive Data Language (IDL). In this respect, the astrophysics and solar physics communities differ widely: 78% of solar physics faculty, staff scientists, and researchers in our sample uses IDL, compared with 44% of astrophysics faculty and scientists sampled by Momcheva and Tollerud (2015). 63$\pm$4% of respondents have not taken any computer-science courses at an undergraduate or graduate level. We also found that most respondents utilize consumer hardware to run software for solar-physics research. Although 82% of respondents work with data from space-based or ground-based missions, some of which (e.g. the Solar Dynamics Observatory and Daniel K. Inouye Solar Telescope) produce terabytes of data a day, 14% use a regional or national cluster, 5% use a commercial cloud provider, and 29% use exclusively a laptop or desktop. Finally, we found that 73$\pm$4% of respondents cite scientific software in their research, although only 42$\pm$3% do so routinely.