论文标题
Bohr - Einstein辩论中的交流不足
An Underappreciated Exchange in the Bohr--Einstein Debate
论文作者
论文摘要
Bohr --Einstein辩论是物理学史上最显着的旷日化智力交流之一。它的影响力一直持久：2013年关于量子基础的调查中，少数几个明确的模式之一是，认为玻尔是正确的物理学家很容易说爱因斯坦是错误的。交流始于1920年Bohr和Einstein在1920年首次开会，在接下来的十年的索尔维会议上继续进行，并于1935年与EPR Paradox一起达到了一个戏剧性的渐进式曲调，此后继续进行。并非这一长篇小说中的每个情节都得到了同样的调查。特别是，与爱因斯坦的同样巧妙的答复相比，造成Bohr的一份后期陈述获得了更严格的检查。
The Bohr--Einstein debate is one of the more remarkable protracted intellectual exchanges in the history of physics. Its influence has been lasting: One of the few clear patterns in a 2013 survey about quantum foundations was that the physicists who believed Bohr to be correct were apt to say that Einstein had been wrong. The exchanges began when Bohr and Einstein first met in 1920, continued at the Solvay conferences of the following decade, reached a dramatic crescendo with the EPR paradox in 1935, and continued thereafter. Not every episode in this long story has been investigated equally. In particular, one late statement attributed to Bohr has received much more intense examination than Einstein's equally pithy reply.
