论文标题
指数增长的预测偏差并遵守Covid-19时期的安全措施
Exponential-growth prediction bias and compliance with safety measures in the times of COVID-19
论文作者
论文摘要
我们进行了一个独特的基于亚马逊MTURK的全球实验,以研究指数增长预测偏见(EGPB)在理解为什么Covid-19爆发爆发为何爆炸中的重要性。我们询问的科学基础是一个公认的事实,即疾病的传播,尤其是在初始阶段,遵循指数功能,这意味着如果该疾病足够传播,很少有积极病例可以爆炸成广泛的大流行。我们将预测偏差定义为由于对X-Weeks的案例数量的错误预测引起的系统误差,因此,在同一Y-Week中呈现Y-Weeks时,实际数据是相同的。我们的设计使我们能够确定这种不低估的根源为EGPB,这是由于一般趋势低估了指数过程不断发展的速度而产生的。我们的数据表明,在疾病的预测路径中反映的“凸度”显着且大大低于实际路径。相对于疾病进展的早期阶段的受访者,国家受访者的偏见明显更高。我们发现,表现出EGPB的个人也更有可能明显降低对WHO推荐的安全措施的遵守情况,发现对安全协议的普遍违反行为较小,并对政府的行动表现出更大的信心。一个简单的行为推动,它以原始数字显示了先前的数据,而不是图形可因果降低EGPB。通过原始数字进行清晰的风险交流可以提高风险感知的准确性,进而促进遵守建议的保护行为。
We conduct a unique, Amazon MTurk-based global experiment to investigate the importance of an exponential-growth prediction bias (EGPB) in understanding why the COVID-19 outbreak has exploded. The scientific basis for our inquiry is the well-established fact that disease spread, especially in the initial stages, follows an exponential function meaning few positive cases can explode into a widespread pandemic if the disease is sufficiently transmittable. We define prediction bias as the systematic error arising from faulty prediction of the number of cases x-weeks hence when presented with y-weeks of prior, actual data on the same. Our design permits us to identify the root of this under-prediction as an EGPB arising from the general tendency to underestimate the speed at which exponential processes unfold. Our data reveals that the "degree of convexity" reflected in the predicted path of the disease is significantly and substantially lower than the actual path. The bias is significantly higher for respondents from countries at a later stage relative to those at an early stage of disease progression. We find that individuals who exhibit EGPB are also more likely to reveal markedly reduced compliance with the WHO-recommended safety measures, find general violations of safety protocols less alarming, and show greater faith in their government's actions. A simple behavioral nudge which shows prior data in terms of raw numbers, as opposed to a graph, causally reduces EGPB. Clear communication of risk via raw numbers could increase accuracy of risk perception, in turn facilitating compliance with suggested protective behaviors.