论文标题
智能手机和城市规模时代的城市限制
City limits in the age of smartphones and urban scaling
论文作者
论文摘要
城市规划仍然缺乏适当的标准来定义城市系统中的城市边界。从历史上看,这个问题一直符合行政标准,在各国和政治体系之间可能会有很大的不同,从而阻碍了整个城市系统的比较分析。但是,信息和通信技术的广泛使用(ICT)现在允许开发新的定量方法,以揭示社会动态与城市基础设施的关系。实际上,ICT提供了基于对整个城市中城市留下的数百万痕迹的经验分析,可以更准确地描述城市系统的描述。在这项工作中,我们通过分析旅行模式和城市居民的轨迹,在智利有超过100,000名居民中,将计算技术应用于大量手机记录,以定义城市边界。我们创建并分析了从单个旅行轨迹推断出的相互联系的网络。然后,我们使用光谱中心方法对每个位置进行排名。这允许确定对每个城市环境的更高并发和功能重要性的位置。城市扩展分析最终被用作诊断工具,可以将城市与非城市空间区分开。我们方法的地理评估与智利城市集聚的当前和行政定义具有很高的一致性。我们的结果可能被视为城市边界的功能定义。他们还提供了使用越来越大的非规定数据集对城市作为复杂系统的城市规模和数据驱动方法的实际实施。
Urban planning still lacks appropriate standards to define city boundaries across urban systems. This issue has historically been left to administrative criteria, which can vary significantly across countries and political systems, hindering a comparative analysis across urban systems. However, the wide use of Information and Communication Technologies (ICT) has now allowed the development of new quantitative approaches to unveil how social dynamics relates to urban infrastructure. In fact, ICT provide the potential to portray more accurate descriptions of the urban systems based on the empirical analysis of millions of traces left by urbanites across the city. In this work, we apply computational techniques over a large volume of mobile phone records to define urban boundaries, through the analysis of travel patterns and the trajectory of urban dwellers in conurbations with more than 100,000 inhabitants in Chile. We created and analyzed the network of interconnected places inferred from individual travel trajectories. We then ranked each place using a spectral centrality method. This allowed to identify places of higher concurrency and functional importance for each urban environment. Urban scaling analysis is finally used as a diagnostic tool that allowed to distinguish urban from non-urban spaces. The geographic assessment of our method shows a high congruence with the current and administrative definitions of urban agglomerations in Chile. Our results can potentially be considered as a functional definition of the urban boundary. They also provide a practical implementation of urban scaling and data-driven approaches on cities as complex systems using increasingly larger non-conventional datasets.