论文标题
具有老虎框架的螺旋星系的局部模拟:I。恒星形成和手臂马刺/羽毛
Local Simulations of Spiral Galaxies with the TIGRESS Framework: I. Star Formation and Arm Spurs/Feathers
论文作者
论文摘要
螺旋臂极大地影响磁盘星系中的气流和恒星形成。我们使用局部三维模拟,对具有出色的螺旋潜力的垂直分层,自我磨损,差异旋转,星际培养基(ISM)进行研究,以研究螺旋臂对恒星形成和手臂骨折的恒星形成和形成的影响。我们采用Kim&Ostriker(2017)的Tigress框架来处理辐射加热和冷却,星星形成以及随之而来的超新星(SN)反馈。我们发现,超过90%的恒星形成发生在螺旋臂中,但是与No-Arm对手相比,具有螺旋臂模型的全球恒星形成率(SFR)的增强率不到2倍。这是由于SFR表面密度sigma_sfr与气体表面密度Sigma之间的准线性关系引起的,并支持螺旋臂不会触发恒星形成而是浓缩恒星形成区域的情况。相关的SN反馈在磁化和未磁化模型中都会从臂下游产生气态刺激/羽毛。这些马刺/羽毛是短暂的,具有与其长度平行的磁场,与寿命长的特征相反,其引力不稳定引起的垂直磁场。 SN反馈驱动磁场的湍流组件,总磁场强度与Sigma成正比。在臂和组中,总平面压力的变化约为10倍,但在本地与总垂直ISM重量一致,而Sigma_SFR在本地与压力调节的,反馈调制的理论的预测一致。
Spiral arms greatly affect gas flows and star formation in disk galaxies. We use local three-dimensional simulations of the vertically-stratified, self-gravitating, differentially-rotating, interstellar medium (ISM) subject to a stellar spiral potential to study the effects of spiral arms on star formation and formation of arm spurs/feathers. We adopt the TIGRESS framework of Kim & Ostriker (2017) to handle radiative heating and cooling, star formation, and ensuing supernova (SN) feedback. We find that more than 90% of star formation takes place in spiral arms, but the global star formation rate (SFR) in models with spiral arms is enhanced by less than a factor of 2 compared to the no-arm counterpart. This results from a quasi-linear relationship between the SFR surface density Sigma_SFR and the gas surface density Sigma, and supports the picture that spiral arms do not trigger star formation but rather concentrate star-forming regions. Correlated SN feedback produces gaseous spurs/feathers downstream from arms in both magnetized and unmagnetized models. These spurs/feathers are short-lived and have magnetic fields parallel to their length, in contrast to the longer-lived features with perpendicular magnetic fields induced by gravitational instability. SN feedback drives the turbulent component of magnetic fields, with the total magnetic field strength sublinearly proportional to Sigma. The total midplane pressure varies by a factor of ~10 between arm and interarm regions but agrees locally with the total vertical ISM weight, while Sigma_SFR is locally consistent with the prediction of pressure-regulated, feedback-modulated theory.