论文标题
澄清基于问题的系统的实证研究
An Empirical Study of Clarifying Question-Based Systems
论文作者
论文摘要
搜索和推荐系统主动提出澄清问题,以更好地了解用户的信息需求正在从研究社区受到越来越多的关注。但是,据我们所知,没有实证研究来量化用户是否愿意或能够在何种程度上回答这些问题。在这项工作中,我们通过部署实验系统进行在线实验,该实验系统通过提出针对产品存储库的澄清问题与用户进行交互。我们从用户那里收集隐式交互行为数据,也收集了明确的反馈:(a)用户愿意回答大量的澄清问题(平均11-21),但不超过更多; (b)大多数用户回答问题,直到到达目标产品为止,但由于疲劳或收到无关的问题而停止的一小部分; (c)一部分用户的答案(12-17%)实际上与目标产品的描述相反;而(d)大多数用户(66-84%)找到基于问题的系统有助于完成其任务。该研究的一些发现与当前对现场模拟评估的假设相矛盾,而它们则指出了评估框架的改进,并且可以激发未来的交互式搜索/推荐系统设计。
Search and recommender systems that take the initiative to ask clarifying questions to better understand users' information needs are receiving increasing attention from the research community. However, to the best of our knowledge, there is no empirical study to quantify whether and to what extent users are willing or able to answer these questions. In this work, we conduct an online experiment by deploying an experimental system, which interacts with users by asking clarifying questions against a product repository. We collect both implicit interaction behavior data and explicit feedback from users showing that: (a) users are willing to answer a good number of clarifying questions (11-21 on average), but not many more than that; (b) most users answer questions until they reach the target product, but also a fraction of them stops due to fatigue or due to receiving irrelevant questions; (c) part of the users' answers (12-17%) are actually opposite to the description of the target product; while (d) most of the users (66-84%) find the question-based system helpful towards completing their tasks. Some of the findings of the study contradict current assumptions on simulated evaluations in the field, while they point towards improvements in the evaluation framework and can inspire future interactive search/recommender system designs.