论文标题

核对低和高红移的GRB亮度相关性

Reconciling low and high redshift GRB luminosity correlations

论文作者

Huang, Lu, Huang, Zhiqi, Luo, Xiaolin, He, Xinbo, Fang, Yuhong

论文摘要

长伽马射线爆发(GRBS)(所谓的Amati关系),通常用于约束高雷德希夫杂物图。假设Lambda冷暗物质($λ$ CDM)宇宙学,Wang等。在低红移GRB样品之间的数据校准的AMATI系数中发现了$ \ gtrsim3σ$张力。为了减少基准宇宙学的影响,我们使用基于宇宙年龄(PAGE)的参数化,这是一个几乎与模型无关的框架来追踪宇宙学扩展历史。我们发现,对于Page覆盖的广泛模型,AMATI系数中的低红移张力几乎保持不变,这表明宇宙学假设不是GRB亮度相关性红移演化的主要驱动力。接下来,我们分析了由于观测中的通量限制而引起的选择效果。我们发现Amati关系在$ e _ {\ rm ISO} $的能量尺度上的演变更大。我们通过选择性地丢弃样本以匹配低$ z $和高$ z $ $ e _ {\ rm iso} $发行来匹配GRB数据。在进行辩解之后,Amati系数在低$ z $和高$ z $数据组之间很好地吻合,而$ e _ {\ rm ISO} $的证据 - amati关系的依赖性仍然很强。因此,GRB光度相关性的红移演变可以完全解释为选择偏见,并不意味着GRB的宇宙学演化。

The correlation between the peak spectra energy ($E_p$) and the equivalent isotropic energy ($E_{\rm iso}$) of long gamma-ray bursts (GRBs), the so-called Amati relation, is often used to constrain the high-redshift Hubble diagram. Assuming Lambda cold dark matter ($Λ$CDM) cosmology, Wang et al. found a $\gtrsim 3σ$ tension in the data-calibrated Amati coefficients between low- and high-redshift GRB samples. To reduce the impact of fiducial cosmology, we use the Parameterization based on cosmic Age (PAge), an almost model-independent framework to trace the cosmological expansion history. We find that the low- and high-redshift tension in Amati coefficients stays almost the same for the broad class of models covered by PAge, indicating that the cosmological assumption is not the dominant driver of the redshift evolution of GRB luminosity correlation. Next, we analyze the selection effect due to flux limits in observations. We find Amati relation evolves much more significantly across energy scales of $E_{\rm iso}$. We debias the GRB data by selectively discarding samples to match low-$z$ and high-$z$ $E_{\rm iso}$ distributions. After debiasing, the Amati coefficients agree well between low-$z$ and high-$z$ data groups, whereas the evidence of $E_{\rm iso}$-dependence of Amati relation remains to be strong. Thus, the redshift evolution of GRB luminosity correlation can be fully interpreted as a selection bias, and does not imply cosmological evolution of GRBs.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源