论文标题
人脑网络的成本效率折衷,由多主体进化算法揭示
Cost-efficiency trade-offs of the human brain network revealed by a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm
论文作者
论文摘要
人们普遍认为,大脑网络结构的形成在降低布线成本和促进通信效率之间的最佳权衡压力下。但是,这种权衡是否存在于经验性的人脑网络中,如果是的,那么生效仍无法很好地理解。在这里,我们采用了一种多主体进化算法来直接和定量地探索人类脑网络中的成本效率权衡。使用该算法,我们生成了具有最佳但多样化的成本效率权衡的综合网络人群。发现这些合成网络不仅可以重现经验大脑网络中的大部分连接,而且还可以嵌入类似于小世界的结构。此外,在集线器区域的空间布置和模块化结构方面,发现合成和经验的大脑网络相似,这是两个重要的拓扑特征,被广泛假定为成本效率折衷的结果。像经验大脑网络一样,合成网络对随机攻击具有很高的鲁棒性。此外,我们还揭示了经验大脑网络的合成网络的一些差异,包括较低的隔离处理能力和针对目标攻击的稳健性较弱。这些发现提供了直接和定量的证据,表明人类脑网络的结构确实在很大程度上受到最佳成本效益权衡的影响。我们还建议,一些其他因素(例如,隔离处理能力)可能会以成本和效率共同确定网络组织。
It is widely believed that the formation of brain network structure is under the pressure of optimal trade-off between reducing wiring cost and promoting communication efficiency. However, the question of whether this trade-off exists in empirical human brain networks and, if so, how it takes effect is still not well understood. Here, we employed a multiobjective evolutionary algorithm to directly and quantitatively explore the cost-efficiency trade-off in human brain networks. Using this algorithm, we generated a population of synthetic networks with optimal but diverse cost-efficiency trade-offs. It was found that these synthetic networks could not only reproduce a large portion of connections in the empirical brain networks but also embed a resembling small-world structure. Moreover, the synthetic and empirical brain networks were found similar in terms of the spatial arrangement of hub regions and the modular structure, which are two important topological features widely assumed to be outcomes of cost-efficiency trade-offs. The synthetic networks had high robustness against random attack as the empirical brain networks did. Additionally, we also revealed some differences of the synthetic networks from the empirical brain networks, including lower segregated processing capacity and weaker robustness against targeted attack. These findings provide direct and quantitative evidence that the structure of human brain networks is indeed largely influenced by optimal cost-efficiency trade-offs. We also suggest that some additional factors (e.g., segregated processing capacity) might jointly determine the network organization with cost and efficiency.