论文标题
通过有效的重复推理机器重建看不见的方式和病理
Reconstructing unseen modalities and pathology with an efficient Recurrent Inference Machine
论文作者
论文摘要
目的:允许使用经常性推理机(RIM)进行图像重建的有效学习,而不是严格依赖训练数据分布,以便仍然可以准确恢复看不见的方式和病理。方法:从理论上讲,轮辋学会了解决加速MRI重建的反问题,而对可变成像条件的鲁棒性。研究了不同训练数据集的效率和概括功能,以及复杂性降低的经常性网络单位:封闭式复发单元(GRU),最小门控单元(MGU)和独立的复发性神经网络(INDRNN),以减少推论时间。对压缩传感(CS)进行了验证,并根据训练期间看不见的数据进一步评估。通过重建模拟的白质病变并前瞻性地采样多发性硬化症患者来进行病理研究。结果:单个模态的培训3T $ T_1 $加权的大脑数据似乎还足以重建7T $ T_ {2}^*$ - 加权大脑和3T $ T_2 $ - 加权的膝盖数据。 INDRNN是一个有效的复发单元,与CS相比,推理时间减少了68%,而保持性能。在接受$ T_2 $加权的膝盖数据培训时,篮筐能够在训练过程中更准确地重建病变。与CS相比,对$ t_1 $加权的大脑数据和组合数据的培训略微增强了信号。结论:边缘在降低其复杂性时是有效的,从而减少了推理时间,而在训练过程中仍然不见了。
Objective: To allow efficient learning using the Recurrent Inference Machine (RIM) for image reconstruction whereas not being strictly dependent on the training data distribution so that unseen modalities and pathologies are still accurately recovered. Methods: Theoretically, the RIM learns to solve the inverse problem of accelerated-MRI reconstruction whereas being robust to variable imaging conditions. The efficiency and generalization capabilities with different training datasets were studied, as well as recurrent network units with decreasing complexity: the Gated Recurrent Unit (GRU), the Minimal Gated Unit (MGU), and the Independently Recurrent Neural Network (IndRNN), to reduce inference times. Validation was performed against Compressed Sensing (CS) and further assessed based on data unseen during training. A pathology study was conducted by reconstructing simulated white matter lesions and prospectively undersampled data of a Multiple Sclerosis patient. Results: Training on a single modality of 3T $T_1$-weighted brain data appeared sufficient to also reconstruct 7T $T_{2}^*$-weighted brain and 3T $T_2$-weighted knee data. The IndRNN is an efficient recurrent unit, reducing inference time by 68\% compared to CS, whereas maintaining performance. The RIM was able to reconstruct lesions unseen during training more accurately than CS when trained on $T_2$-weighted knee data. Training on $T_1$-weighted brain data and on combined data slightly enhanced the signal compared to CS. Conclusion: The RIM is efficient when decreasing its complexity, which reduces the inference time, whereas still being able to reconstruct data and pathology that was unseen during training.