论文标题
脉搏和网络驾驶具有驱动性约束：pontryagin方法
Pulse-and-Glide Driving with Drivability Constraints: A Pontryagin Approach
论文作者
论文摘要
本文使用蓬松的方法来分析不同名义车速的脉搏和机驾驶。有大量文献支持以下事实：与以恒定速度驾驶相比，脉搏和轨道有可能减少燃油消耗，但是各种名义速度的益处仍然相对尚未探索。在文献的基础上，我们制定了一个速度轨迹优化问题，其中目的是燃油消耗和平均车速的线性量表组合，除了对混蛋的二次罚款。通过使用串联蛋白方法分析此优化问题，我们表明（i）对于每个名义速度，在混蛋上有一个关键的惩罚，最佳解决方案是脉搏和果蝇，最佳解决方案，最佳的罚款，最佳的脉搏和滑动轨迹轨迹的最佳轨迹切换是无限速度的，而不是不断的脉搏，而不是持续的脉动，而不是持续的脉搏，而不是沿着脉冲驱动，而不是驾驶的态度，而不是驾驶的态度，则是驾驶的态度，而不是驾驶的态度，而不是驾驶的态度，而不是驾驶的态度。在混蛋。
This paper uses Pontryagin methods to analyze pulse-and-glide driving for different nominal vehicle speeds. There is significant literature supporting the fact that pulse-and-glide has the potential to reduce fuel consumption compared to driving at a constant speed, but the benefits at a variety of nominal speeds remain relatively unexplored. Building on the literature, we formulate a speed trajectory optimization problem where the objective is a linearly-scalarized Pareto combination of fuel consumption and average vehicle speed, in addition to a quadratic penalty on jerk. By analyzing this optimization problem using Pontryagin methods, we show that (i) for each nominal speed, there is a critical penalty on jerk below which the optimal solution is pulse-and-glide, (ii) without any penalty on jerk, the optimal pulse-and-glide trajectory switches infinitely fast, and (iii) above a critical nominal velocity, the optimal solution is steady-speed driving rather than pulse-and-glide, regardless of the penalty on jerk.
