论文标题

对一般相对性的非线性物质扩展的观察性约束

Observational constraints on nonlinear matter extensions of general relativity

论文作者

Kolonia, E. -A., Martins, C. J. A. P.

论文摘要

我们对FLRW宇宙学模型类别的当前观察性约束进行了现象学分析,其中Einstein方程的物质侧包括,除了规范术语外,还包括与能量巨型张量的某些功能成比例的术语($ t^2 = t^2 = t_ {αβ} T^{αβ} t^{αβ} t^{α- ($ t =ρ-3p $)。定性地,人们可能会认为这些模型是与非线性物质拉格朗日的一般相对性的扩展。因此,它们与通常的动态暗能量或修饰的重力模型有所不同:在以前的模型中,一个人在拉格朗日(Lagrangian)(通常以标量场的形式)增加了动力学自由度,而在后者的拉格朗日重力部分则改变了。 We study both of these models under two different scenarios: (1) as phenomenological two-parameter or three-parameter extensions of the standard $Λ$CDM, in which case the model still has a cosmological constant but the nonlinear matter Lagrangian leads to additional terms in Einstein's equations, which cosmological observations tightly constrain, and (2) as alternatives to $Λ$CDM, where there is no cosmological constant, and非线性物质术语必须提供加速度(这将在精神上与通常的修改重力模型更接近)。对在各种情况下获得的观察性约束的比较分析提供了对$λ$模型的鲁棒性水平以及仍然可用于现象学替代方案的参数空间的一些见解。

We present a phenomenological analysis of current observational constraints on classes of FLRW cosmological models in which the matter side of Einstein's equations includes, in addition to the canonical term, a term proportional to some function of the energy-momentum tensor ($T^2=T_{αβ}T^{αβ}=ρ^2+3p^2$), or of its trace ($T=ρ-3p$). Qualitatively, one may think of these models as extensions of general relativity with a nonlinear matter Lagrangian. As such they are somewhat different from the usual dynamical dark energy or modified gravity models: in the former class of models one adds further dynamical degrees of freedom to the Lagrangian (often in the form of scalar fields), while in the latter the gravitational part of the Lagrangian is changed. We study both of these models under two different scenarios: (1) as phenomenological two-parameter or three-parameter extensions of the standard $Λ$CDM, in which case the model still has a cosmological constant but the nonlinear matter Lagrangian leads to additional terms in Einstein's equations, which cosmological observations tightly constrain, and (2) as alternatives to $Λ$CDM, where there is no cosmological constant, and the nonlinear matter term would have to provide the acceleration (which would be somewhat closer in spirit to the usual modified gravity models). A comparative analysis of the observational constraints obtained in the various cases provides some insight on the level of robustness of the $Λ$ model and on the parameter space still available for phenomenological alternatives.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源