论文标题
基于苔丝观测值,关于具有较大半径不确定性的膨胀系外行星的参数细化
On the parameter refinement of inflated exoplanets with large radius uncertainty based on TESS observations
论文作者
论文摘要
我们使用过渡系系列卫星(TESS)提供的公开可用数据重新审视了十个已知的系外行星系统。这项工作中提出的样本包括短期转运系外行星,半径膨胀和大量报告的行星半径不确定性。这些值的精确确定对于开发准确的进化模型并了解这些系统的通胀机制至关重要。为了评估行星半径测量,我们使用了行星与星形半径比,这是可以在过境事件中测量的数量。我们将使用一个脱键模型和运输模型拟合每个目标的传输光曲线。此外,我们使用的是基于马尔可夫链蒙特卡洛方法的主持人来评估感兴趣的每个系统参数的最佳拟合后分布。我们将WASP-140 B的行星半径改进了约12%,我们在报告的不对称半径不确定性上提出了更好的精度,约为86%和67%。我们还将WASP-1220 B的轨道参数改进了2 $σ$。此外,使用高积压苔丝数据集,我们能够解决文献中的差异,内容涉及系外行星WASP-93 b的行星半径。对于我们样品中的所有其他系外行星,即使有一种试探性趋势,即在文献中略微高估了(近)放牧系统的行星半径,但行星半径的估计值和轨道参数得到了空间的独立观察,表明苔丝和地面基于地面的观察是良好的一致性。
We revisited ten known exoplanetary systems using publicly available data provided by the Transiting Exoplanet Survey Satellite (TESS). The sample presented in this work consists of short period transiting exoplanets, with inflated radii and large reported uncertainty on their planetary radii. The precise determination of these values is crucial in order to develop accurate evolutionary models and understand the inflation mechanisms of these systems. Aiming to evaluate the planetary radius measurement, we made use of the planet-to-star radii ratio, a quantity that can be measured during a transit event. We fit the obtained transit light curves of each target with a detrending model and a transit model. Furthermore, we used emcee, which is based on a Markov chain Monte Carlo approach, to assess the best fit posterior distributions of each system parameter of interest. We refined the planetary radius of WASP-140 b by approximately 12%, and we derived a better precision on its reported asymmetric radius uncertainty by approximately 86% and 67%. We also refined the orbital parameters of WASP-120 b by 2$σ$. Moreover, using the high-cadence TESS datasets, we were able to solve a discrepancy in the literature, regarding the planetary radius of the exoplanet WASP-93 b. For all the other exoplanets in our sample, even though there is a tentative trend that planetary radii of (near-) grazing systems have been slightly overestimated in the literature, the planetary radius estimation and the orbital parameters were confirmed with independent observations from space, showing that TESS and ground-based observations are overall in good agreement.