论文标题
精确测量两个磁矩之间的角度及其在单分子磁铁中的构型稳定性
Precise measurement of angles between two magnetic moments and their configurational stability in single-molecule magnets
论文作者
论文摘要
在两种$ 4F $矩之间的交换和偶极相互作用产生的障碍物$ u_ {fa} $的障碍物单分子磁铁(SMMS)中低温磁耦合的关键参数。在这里,我们扩展了先前用于描述折叠式内叶烯的基态的假蛋白模型,以说明单离子各向异性轴的方向变化,并将其应用于两个smms dy $ _2 $ _2 $ scn@c $ _ c $ _ {80} $ {80} $和dy $ _2 $ _2 $ _2 $ _2 $ tic@c $ _ 80} $ {80} $。尽管X射线磁性圆形二色性(XMCD)表示这两个分子中的$ J_z = 15/2 $ dy地面固体,但染色-DY耦合强度和磁化的稳定性是不同的。我们证明,屏障$ u_ {fa} $的大小和两个$ 4F $矩之间的角度直接从精确的温度依赖性磁化数据中直接确定,其精度比$ 1^{\ circ} $更好。实验发现的$ 4F $矩之间的角度与两个染色离子的定量轴之间计算的角度非常吻合。理论表明,Dy磁矩从Dy键轴到中央离子的方向更大的偏差,以Dy $ _2 $ _2 $ tic@c $ _ {80} $。这可能解释了磁化磁化的较低稳定性,尽管它表现出$ \ sim 49 \%$ stront confence耦合,而不是dy $ _2 $ scn@c $ _ c $ _ {80} $。
A key parameter for the low-temperature magnetic coupling of in dinuclear lanthanide single-molecule magnets (SMMs) is the barrier $U_{FA}$ resulting from the exchange and dipole interactions between the two $4f$ moments. Here we extend the pseudospin model previously used to describe the ground state of dinuclear endofullerenes to account for variations in the orientation of the single-ion anisotropy axes and apply it to the two SMMs Dy$_2$ScN@C$_{80}$ and Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$. While x-ray magnetic circular dichroism (XMCD) indicates the same $J_z=15/2$ Dy groundstate in both molecules, the Dy-Dy coupling strength and the stability of magnetization is distinct. We demonstrate that both the magnitude of the barrier $U_{FA}$ and the angle between the two $4f$ moments are determined directly from precise temperature-dependent magnetization data to an accuracy better than $1^{\circ}$. The experimentally found angles between the $4f$ moments are in excellent agreement with calculated angles between the quantisation axes of the two Dy ions. Theory indicates a larger deviation of the orientation of the Dy magnetic moments from the Dy bond axes to the central ion in Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$. This may explain the lower stability of the magnetisation in Dy$_2$TiC@C$_{80}$, although it exhibits a $\sim 49\%$ stronger exchange coupling than in Dy$_2$ScN@C$_{80}$.