论文标题

更少的东西?为什么重新销售陆上风电场并不总是会导致更多的风力发电 - 德国案例研究

Getting more with less? Why repowering onshore wind farms does not always lead to more wind power generation -- a German case study

论文作者

Unnewehr, Jan Frederick, Jalbout, Eddy, Jung, Christopher, Schindler, Dirk, Weidlich, Anke

论文摘要

如今,最好的风通常被旧的,效率较低且相对较小的风力涡轮机占据。他们中的许多人很快将在运营终生结束或失去财政支持。因此,重新制作脱颖而出。但是,自最初扩展以来,社会接受和土地利用限制一直在不断变化,这使得新涡轮机的可用区域较少,即使在现有地点也是如此。以德国为例,本研究根据区域分化的土地资格标准评估了高详细陆上风能的重还原潜力。结果表明,在给定的区域标准下,与现状相比,重新制定的运行能力和年能量产量将减少约40 \,\%。这是因为鉴于新制定的排除标准,目前约有一半的风力涡轮机位于限制区域。对排除标准的敏感性分析表明,不连续的城市结构的最小距离是确定可以重新恢复的涡轮机数量的最敏感标准。由于对此法规的不同区域可能会有很大的差异,因此,此处选择的特定于位置的方法可以比现有方法更现实地评估重还原的潜力。

The best wind locations are nowadays often occupied by old, less efficient and relatively small wind turbines. Many of them will soon reach the end of their operating lifetime, or lose financial support. Therefore, repowering comes to the fore. However, social acceptance and land use restrictions have been under constant change since the initial expansions, which makes less area available for new turbines, even on existing sites. For the example of Germany, this study assesses the repowering potential for onshore wind energy in high detail, on the basis of regionally differentiated land eligibility criteria. The results show that under the given regional criteria, repowering will decrease both operating capacity and annual energy yield by roughly 40\,\% compared to the status quo. This is because around half of the wind turbines are currently located in restricted areas, given newly enacted exclusion criteria. Sensitivity analyses on the exclusion criteria show that the minimum distance to discontinuous urban fabric is the most sensitive criterion in determining the number of turbines that can be repowered. As regulations on this can vary substantially across different regions, the location-specific methodology chosen here can assess the repowering potential more realistically than existing approaches.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源