论文标题
使用通用自适应稳定剂在非线性混沌系统中识别摩擦
Identifying Friction in a Nonlinear Chaotic System Using a Universal Adaptive Stabilizer
论文作者
论文摘要
本文提出了一个可以与高度非线性和混沌系统一起使用的摩擦模型参数识别程序。这项研究的选择系统是一种被动式倾斜的绒毛摆,已知具有高度非线性和耦合模型。摆倾斜以确保其所有自由度都存在稳定的平衡构型,并且链路权重是施加到系统的唯一外部力量。推导了摆锤的非线性分析模型,并从文献中选择了静态摩擦,动态摩擦,粘性摩擦和骨化效应的连续摩擦模型。高增益通用自适应稳定器(UAS)观察者旨在使用关节角度测量识别摩擦模型参数。该方法在模拟中进行了测试,并在实验设置中进行了验证。尽管该系统的非线性高,但该方法被证明是在模拟中收敛到确切的参数值,并在平均拟合优度为85 \%的实验中产生定性参数幅度。仿真和实验结果之间的差异归因于摩擦模型的局限性。该方法的主要优点是计算需求的显着减少以及相对于基于常规优化的识别例程所需的时间。所提出的方法在估计时间中产生的降低超过99%,同时比在执行的每个测试中的优化方法要准确得多。另一个优点是,该方法可以轻松地适应其他模型适合实验数据。
This paper proposes a friction model parameter identification routine that can work with highly nonlinear and chaotic systems. The chosen system for this study is a passively-actuated tilted Furuta pendulum, which is known to have a highly non linear and coupled model. The pendulum is tilted to ensure the existence of a stable equilibrium configuration for all its degrees of freedom, and the link weights are the only external forces applied to the system. A nonlinear analytical model of the pendulum is derived, and a continuous friction model considering static friction, dynamic friction, viscous friction, and the stribeck effect is selected from the literature. A high-gain Universal Adaptive Stabilizer (UAS) observer is designed to identify friction model parameters using joint angle measurements. The methodology is tested in simulation and validated on an experimental setup. Despite the high nonlinearity of the system, the methodology is proven to converge to the exact parameter values, in simulation, and to yield qualitative parameter magnitudes in experiments where the goodness of fit was around 85\% on average. The discrepancy between the simulation and the experimental results is attributed to the limitations of the friction model. The main advantage of the proposed method is the significant reduction in computational needs and the time required relative to conventional optimization-based identification routines. The proposed approach yielded more than 99\% reduction in the estimation time while being considerably more accurate than the optimization approach in every test performed. One more advantage is that the approach can be easily adapted to fit other models to experimental data.