论文标题
物联网法证框架（DFIF，IotDots，fsaiot）：一项全面的研究
IoT Forensic Frameworks (DFIF, IoTDOTS,FSAIoT): A Comprehensive Study
论文作者
论文摘要
在物联网中，现在已连接到Internet（IoT），包括汽车，烟雾报警，手表，眼镜，网络摄像头和其他设备在内的数百万个电子产品。除了个人在物联网领域获得的奢华和舒适性以及其轻松，快速地获取信息的能力外，有关方面的另一个方面是在这方面实现隐私和安全性，尤其是考虑到现有和新物联网设备的数量迅速增加。与物联网安全有关的关注，威胁和攻击被视为潜在的研究领域。这需要在物联网环境中以犯罪性质的性质快速开发或创建合适的技术。另一方面，由于各种位置，数据类型，工具和设备识别，刑事调查专家遇到了困难和障碍。本文对物联网的犯罪内容提供了深入的解释。它将其阶段与传统数字取证的详细阶段进行了比较，从相似性和差异，用于处理电子犯罪的框架以及两种类型中使用的技术。本文介绍了数字取证领域研究人员的先前讨论。 For the IoT, which brings us to the most important parts of this paper, which is a comprehensive study of the IoT criminal frameworks that are used to protect communication in the field of IoT, such as Digital Forensic Investigation Framework (DFIF), Digital Forensic Framework for Smart Environments (IoTDOTS), Forensic State Acquisition from the Internet of Things (FSAIoT), and discusses the challenges in their general frameworks and provides solutions and strategies.
In the Internet of Things, millions of electronic items, including automobiles, smoke alarms, watches, eyeglasses, webcams, and other devices, are now connected to the Internet (IoT). Aside from the luxury and comfort that the individual obtains in the field of IoT, as well as its ability to communicate and obtain information easily and quickly, the other concerning aspect is the achievement of privacy and security in this connection, especially given the rapid increase in the number of existing and new IoT devices. Concerns, threats, and assaults related to IoT security have been regarded as a potential and problematic area of research. This necessitates the quick development or creation of suitable technologies with the nature of crimes in the IoT environment. On the other hand, criminal investigation specialists encounter difficulties and hurdles due to various locations, data types, instruments used, and device recognition. This paper provides an in-depth explanation of the criminal content of the Internet of Things. It compares its stages to the detailed stages of traditional digital forensics in terms of similarities and differences, the frameworks used in dealing with electronic crimes, and the techniques used in both types. This paper presents previous discussions of researchers in the field of digital forensics. For the IoT, which brings us to the most important parts of this paper, which is a comprehensive study of the IoT criminal frameworks that are used to protect communication in the field of IoT, such as Digital Forensic Investigation Framework (DFIF), Digital Forensic Framework for Smart Environments (IoTDOTS), Forensic State Acquisition from the Internet of Things (FSAIoT), and discusses the challenges in their general frameworks and provides solutions and strategies.
