论文标题
测量和改善社区弹性:一种模糊的逻辑方法
Measuring and improving community resilience: a Fuzzy Logic approach
论文作者
论文摘要
由于全球自然和人为灾难的频率不断增加,科学界近年来对弹性工程的概念非常关注。另一方面,当局和决策者一直在集中精力制定可以帮助提高社区韧性对不同类型的极端事件的战略。由于通常不可能防止每种风险,因此重点是以最大程度地减少对社区影响(例如人类和其他系统)的方式来适应和管理风险。文献中已经提出了几种韧性策略,以减少灾害风险并提高社区的适应能力。通常,由于不确定性和估计过程所需的数据的不可用而使弹性评估具有挑战性。本文提出了一种模糊的逻辑方法,用于量化社区的韧性。该方法基于人民框架,这是一个基于指标的层次结构框架,定义了社区的各个方面。实施了一种基于模糊的方法,以使用描述性知识而不是硬数据来量化人们的指标,这也考虑了分析中涉及的不确定性。为了证明该方法的适用性,使用有关洛马普里埃塔地震之前和之后的旧金山城市功能的数据用于获得人民框架的物理基础设施维度的弹性指数。结果表明,尽管指标不确定性,该方法可以很好地估算社区的弹性。因此,它是一种决策支持工具,可帮助决策者和利益相关者评估和提高其社区的韧性。
Due to the increasing frequency of natural and man-made disasters worldwide, the scientific community has paid considerable attention to the concept of resilience engineering in recent years. Authorities and decision-makers, on the other hand, have been focusing their efforts to develop strategies that can help increase community resilience to different types of extreme events. Since it is often impossible to prevent every risk, the focus is on adapting and managing risks in ways that minimize impacts to communities (e.g., humans and other systems). Several resilience strategies have been proposed in the literature to reduce disaster risk and improve community resilience. Generally, resilience assessment is challenging due to uncertainty and unavailability of data necessary for the estimation process. This paper proposes a Fuzzy Logic method for quantifying community resilience. The methodology is based on the PEOPLES framework, an indicator-based hierarchical framework that defines all aspects of the community. A fuzzy-based approach is implemented to quantify the PEOPLES indicators using descriptive knowledge instead of hard data, accounting also for the uncertainties involved in the analysis. To demonstrate the applicability of the methodology, data regarding the functionality of the city San Francisco before and after the Loma Prieta earthquake are used to obtain a resilience index of the Physical Infrastructure dimension of the PEOPLES framework. The results show that the methodology can provide good estimates of community resilience despite the uncertainty of the indicators. Hence, it serves as a decision-support tool to help decision-makers and stakeholders assess and improve the resilience of their communities.