论文标题

重新审视潮汐破坏事件的速度:部分潮汐破坏事件的作用

Revisit the rate of tidal disruption events: the role of the partial tidal disruption event

论文作者

Zhong, Shiyan, Li, Shuo, Berczik, Peter, Spurzem, Rainer

论文摘要

含有超级质量中央黑洞(SMBH)的密集核恒星簇中恒星的潮汐破坏是通过高敏锐的直接N体模拟模拟的。星星离SMBH太近了,潮汐破坏了,潮汐破坏事件(TDE)发生。 TDES探针特性,其积聚磁盘和周围的核恒星簇。在本文中,我们将全潮中断事件(FTDE)的发生率与部分潮汐破坏事件(PTDE)进行了比较。由于PTDE不会破坏恒星,因此剩下的物体出现了。我们为此使用“剩余之星”一词;在模拟中发生了两个新的效果:(1)剩余恒星的质量和半径的变化,(2)剩余恒星轨道能的变化。在我们的模拟中打开了这两种效果后,FTDE的数量减少了大约28%,并且减少主要是由于剩余的恒星从PTDE中射出最初来自相对较大的距离。 PTDE的数量比Stone等人给出的简单估计高约75%。 (2020),增强主要是由于居住在扩散状态下的剩余恒星产生的多个PTD。我们计算了模拟中记录的PTDE和FTDE的峰值质量降低率,并发现58%的PTDE具有超过爱丁顿限制的峰值质量后备率,而Super-Eddington PTDES的数量是超级埃德丁顿FTDES的2.3倍。

Tidal disruption of stars in dense nuclear star clusters containing supermassive central black holes (SMBH) is modeled by high-accuracy direct N-body simulation. Stars getting too close to the SMBH are tidally disrupted and a tidal disruption event (TDE) happens. TDEs probe properties of SMBH, their accretion disks, and the surrounding nuclear stellar cluster. In this paper we compare rates of full tidal disruption events (FTDE) with partial tidal disruption events (PTDE). Since a PTDE does not destroy the star, a leftover object emerges; we use the term 'leftover star' for it; two novel effects occur in the simulation: (1) variation of the leftover star's mass and radius, (2) variation of the leftover star's orbital energy. After switching on these two effects in our simulation, the number of FTDEs is reduced by roughly 28%, and the reduction is mostly due to the ejection of the leftover stars from PTDEs coming originally from relatively large distance. The number of PTDEs is about 75% higher than the simple estimation given by Stone et al. (2020), and the enhancement is mainly due to the multiple PTDEs produced by the leftover stars residing in the diffusive regime. We compute the peak mass fallback rate for the PTDEs and FTDEs recorded in the simulation, and find 58% of the PTDEs have peak mass fallback rate exceeding the Eddington limit, and the number of super-Eddington PTDEs is 2.3 times the number of super-Eddington FTDEs.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源