论文标题

通过时间和学科的权力下放的概念:定量探索

The Concept of Decentralization Through Time and Disciplines: A Quantitative Exploration

论文作者

Di Bona, Gabriele, Bracci, Alberto, Perra, Nicola, Latora, Vito, Baronchelli, Andrea

论文摘要

权力下放是在包括经济学,政治学和计算机科学在内的跨学科中发现的一个普遍的概念,在该学科中以不同的方式使用。在这里,我们开发并公开发布了一条通用管道,以调查该术语的学术历史,分析425,144个学术出版物,指的是(de)集中化。我们发现,自1950年代以来,关于该主题的论文的比例已成倍增加。在2021年,154名作者提到了文章标题或摘要中的(de)集中化。使用语义信息和引文模式,我们将论文集中在字段中,并表征它们之间的知识流。我们的分析表明,该主题在不同领域独立出现,并具有小的跨学科污染。此外,我们展示了大约10年前区块链如何成为最具影响力的领域,而治理在1990年代之前占据了主导地位。总而言之,我们的发现提供了对关键但难以捉摸的概念的演变的定量评估,该概念发生了兴起的循环。我们的管道提供了一种强大的工具来分析学术文献中任何学术术语的演变,从而提供了对科学集体和独立发现之间相互作用的见解。

Decentralization is a pervasive concept found across disciplines, including Economics, Political Science, and Computer Science, where it is used in distinct yet interrelated ways. Here, we develop and publicly release a general pipeline to investigate the scholarly history of the term, analysing 425,144 academic publications that refer to (de)centralization. We find that the fraction of papers on the topic has been exponentially increasing since the 1950s. In 2021, 1 author in 154 mentioned (de)centralization in the title or abstract of an article. Using both semantic information and citation patterns, we cluster papers in fields and characterize the knowledge flows between them. Our analysis reveals that the topic has independently emerged in the different fields, with small cross-disciplinary contamination. Moreover, we show how Blockchain has become the most influential field about 10 years ago, while Governance dominated before the 1990s. In summary, our findings provide a quantitative assessment of the evolution of a key yet elusive concept, which has undergone cycles of rise and fall within different fields. Our pipeline offers a powerful tool to analyze the evolution of any scholarly term in the academic literature, providing insights into the interplay between collective and independent discoveries in science.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源