论文标题
MCI中基于Web的,自我指导的神经认知性能测试的有效性
Validity of Web-based, Self-directed, NeuroCognitive Performance Test in MCI
论文作者
论文摘要
数字认知测试比已建立的纸笔测试具有多种潜在的优势,但尚未对轻度认知障碍的临床评估进行全面评估。神经认知性能测试(NCPT)是一种基于Web的,自我导向的模块化电池,旨在重复评估多个认知领域。我们的目标是检查其与ADAS-COG和MMSE的关系,以及在MCI中的认知和日常功能的既定纸笔测试。我们使用Spearman相关性,回归和主要成分分析,然后进行了因子分析(Varimax旋转)来检查我们的目标。在MCI受试者中,NCPT复合材料与已建立测试的复合度量(r = 0.78,p <0.0001)以及ADAS-COG(r = 0.55,p <0.0001)显着相关。 NCPT和纸笔测试电池都具有相似的因子结构,其中包括具有高特征值的大G组件。类似测试的相关性(例如TRAILS A和B,学习记忆测试)显着(P <0.0001)。此外,NCPT和建立的测试都显着(P <0.01)预测了加州大学圣地亚哥分校基于绩效的技能评估和功能活动问卷,每日功能的措施。 NCPT是一种基于网络的,自我指导的计算机测试,具有较高的同时有效性,并具有既定的测试,因此提供了在MCI中用作研究或临床工具的希望。尽管样本相对较小,对照组和横截面性质的局限性,这些发现与对MCI的自我指导的,基于Web的认知评估的承诺的文献越来越多。
Digital cognitive tests offer several potential advantages over established paper-pencil tests but have not yet been fully evaluated for the clinical evaluation of mild cognitive impairment. The NeuroCognitive Performance Test (NCPT) is a web-based, self-directed, modular battery intended for repeated assessments of multiple cognitive domains. Our objective was to examine its relationship with the ADAS-Cog and MMSE as well as with established paper-pencil tests of cognition and daily functioning in MCI. We used Spearman correlations, regressions and principal components analysis followed by a factor analysis (varimax rotated) to examine our objectives. In MCI subjects, the NCPT composite is significantly correlated with both a composite measure of established tests (r=0.78, p<0.0001) as well as with the ADAS-Cog (r=0.55, p<0.0001). Both NCPT and paper-pencil test batteries had a similar factor structure that included a large g component with a high eigenvalue. The correlation for the analogous tests (e.g. Trails A and B, learning memory tests) were significant (p<0.0001). Further, both the NCPT and established tests significantly (p< 0.01) predicted the University of California San Diego Performance-Based Skills Assessment and Functional Activities Questionnaire, measures of daily functioning. The NCPT, a web-based, self-directed, computerized test, shows high concurrent validity with established tests and hence offers promise for use as a research or clinical tool in MCI. Despite limitations such as a relatively small sample, absence of control group and cross-sectional nature, these findings are consistent with the growing literature on the promise of self-directed, web-based cognitive assessments for MCI.