论文标题
DSM-MOC作为基线:可靠性通过连接的汽车中的冗余蜂窝连通性保证
DSM-MoC as Baseline: Reliability Assurance via Redundant Cellular Connectivity in Connected Cars
论文作者
论文摘要
连接的汽车(CCS)和车辆到所有用例(V2X)用例需要严格的可靠性,以确保安全性和非安全用途。随着网络软件的增加,它变得更加容易使用多个冗余连接选项,而不是依靠单个网络连接。但是这些冗余连接应该在哪里管理?是在网络提供商的核心网络中吗?在我们的工作中,我们调查了在四天,在英格兰东南部的主要 /小道路上,SSM和DSM用于CCS。对于第1天,我们捕获了绩效指标,并确定了四个英国提供商和全球通用模拟的假设多手术器配置。在第2、3和4天,我们在道路或固定位置上建立了测试床,以实际实现网络交换和了解性能(包括TCP和UDP)。根据我们的结果,我们做出了三项贡献。首先,我们证明DSM可以为CCS提供卓越的性能,而不是任何个人网络(假设方案中最多28个百分点),或SSM的页面加载时间长4.8倍。其次,与其他仅限智能手机研究不同,我们的系统级研究表明,在CC的实用DSM现场实施中,可以获得至少12%的改善。第三,我们确认与TCP相比,UDP流量(延迟提高23%)在现场实现中的优势更高(13%)。
Connected Cars (CCs) and vehicle-to-everything (V2X) use cases require stringent reliability for safety and non-safety uses. With increasing network softwarisation, it has become easier to use multiple, redundant connectivity options instead of relying on a single network connectivity. But where should these redundant connections be managed? Is it at a network provider's core network - i.e. supply side managed (SSM) - or at the CC - i.e. demand side managed (DSM)? In our work, we investigate the use of SSM and DSM for CCs on four separate days and across 800 kilometers of major / minor roads in South East England. For Day 1, we captured performance indicators, and determined hypothetical multi-operator configurations for four UK providers and a global Universal SIM. For Day 2, 3& 4, we built and deployed a test-bed to actually implement network switching and understand performance (incl. for TCP & UDP) either on the road or in a stationary location. Based on our results, we make three contributions. First, we show that DSM can deliver superior performance for CCs more than any individual network (up to 28 percentage points in a hypothetical scenario), or SSM which had up to 4.8x longer page load times. Second, unlike other smartphone-only studies, our system-level study demonstrates that improvements of at least 12% can be obtained in a practical DSM field implementation for a CC. Third, we confirm that the advantage of DSM in a field implementation is higher for UDP traffic (23% better latency) compared to TCP (13%).