论文标题
上下文，互补性，信号和铃铛测试
Contextuality, Complementarity, Signaling, and Bell tests
论文作者
论文摘要
这是一份综述，致力于与贝尔不平等的联系的互补性上下文相互作用。我们以互补性开始讨论，我们指出上下文是其种子。 {\ it bohr-contextuality}是可观察到的结果对实验上下文的依赖性，对系统 - apparatus相互作用。从概率上讲，互补性意味着{\ it联合概率分布}（JPD）不存在。而不是JPD，必须使用上下文概率运行。贝尔的不平等被解释为情境性的统计检验，因此是不兼容的。对于上下文依赖性概率，可能会违反这些不平等现象。我们强调的是，贝尔不平等测试的上下文性被称为{\ it into in contion sumelument contextualit} y（jmc），这是Bohr上下文性的特殊情况。然后，我们检查信号传导的作用（边际不一致）。在QM中，信号传导可被视为实验性伪影。但是，实验数据通常具有信号模式。我们讨论可能的信号来源。例如，状态准备对测量设置的依赖性。原则上，可以从信号传导阴影的数据中提取“纯情境化”的度量。该理论被称为{\ it默认情况下}（cbd）。它导致不平等，额外的量化信号传导，贝尔 - 戴法罗夫 - 库贾拉不平等。
This is a review devoted to the complementarity-contextuality interplay with connection to the Bell inequalities. Starting discussion with complementarity, we point out to contextuality as its seed. {\it Bohr-contextuality} is dependence of observable's outcome on the experimental context, on system-apparatus interaction. Probabilistically, complementarity means that the {\it joint probability distribution} (JPD) does not exist. Instead of the JPD, one has to operate with contextual probabilities. The Bell inequalities are interpreted as the statistical tests of contextuality and, hence, incompatibility. For context dependent probabilities, these inequalities may be violated. We stress that contextuality tested by the Bell inequalities is so called {\it joint measurement contextualit}y (JMC), the special case of Bohr's contextuality. Then, we examine the role of signaling (marginal inconsistency). In QM, signaling can be considered as an experimental artifact. However, often experimental data has signaling patterns. We discuss possible sources of signaling; for example, dependence of the state preparation on measurement settings. In principle, one can extract the measure of "pure contextualize" from data shadowed by signaling. This theory known as {\it Contextuality by Default} (CbD). It leads to inequalities with the additional term quantifying signaling, Bell-Dzhafarov-Kujala inequalities.
