论文标题
错误估计和物理知识的增强神经网络的热耦合不可压缩Navier Stokes方程
Error Estimates and Physics Informed Augmentation of Neural Networks for Thermally Coupled Incompressible Navier Stokes Equations
论文作者
论文摘要
物理知情的神经网络(PINN)被证明是近似偏微分方程(PDE)的有前途的方法。 PINN通过在给定域上最大程度地减少基于物理的损失功能来近似PDE解决方案。尽管在PINN在一系列问题类别中的应用方面取得了长足的进步,但PINN的误差估计和收敛性的研究对于确定其良好的经验表现背后的基本原理很重要。本文介绍了热耦合不可压缩的Navier-Stokes方程的多物理问题的PINN的收敛分析和误差估计。通过Beltrami流的模型问题,表明一个小的训练误差意味着一个小的概括误差。介绍了相对于训练残差和搭配点的总误差的后验收敛速率。这对于确定适当数量的训练参数和训练残留阈值具有实践意义,以获得良好的PINNS预测热耦合的稳态层流流。然后将这些收敛速率推广到不同的空间几何形状以及位于层流状态的不同流参数。在PINN的PDE残差中添加了压力泊松方程形式的压力稳定项。与没有增强的情况相比,该物理学通知的增强可通过数量级提高压力场的准确性。将PINN的结果与从稳定有限元方法获得的结果进行了比较,并突出显示了PINN的良好特性。
Physics Informed Neural Networks (PINNs) are shown to be a promising method for the approximation of Partial Differential Equations (PDEs). PINNs approximate the PDE solution by minimizing physics-based loss functions over a given domain. Despite substantial progress in the application of PINNs to a range of problem classes, investigation of error estimation and convergence properties of PINNs, which is important for establishing the rationale behind their good empirical performance, has been lacking. This paper presents convergence analysis and error estimates of PINNs for a multi-physics problem of thermally coupled incompressible Navier-Stokes equations. Through a model problem of Beltrami flow it is shown that a small training error implies a small generalization error. Posteriori convergence rates of total error with respect to the training residual and collocation points are presented. This is of practical significance in determining appropriate number of training parameters and training residual thresholds to get good PINNs prediction of thermally coupled steady state laminar flows. These convergence rates are then generalized to different spatial geometries as well as to different flow parameters that lie in the laminar regime. A pressure stabilization term in the form of pressure Poisson equation is added to the PDE residuals for PINNs. This physics informed augmentation is shown to improve accuracy of the pressure field by an order of magnitude as compared to the case without augmentation. Results from PINNs are compared to the ones obtained from stabilized finite element method and good properties of PINNs are highlighted.