论文标题
重新访问“黑洞熵：更近的外观”中的主张
Revisiting Claims in "Black Hole Entropy: A Closer Look"
论文作者
论文摘要
在这里，我们解释了C. tsallis的答复（熵2021，23（5），630）未能回应（熵2020，22（10），1110）中提出的点，并引入了有关黑洞熵的起源的进一步矛盾。 Tsallis在他的回答中认为，需要保留热力学熵的扩展性。因此，黑洞的熵功能不足。在这里，我们解释了这种推理对黑洞热力学的不良后果。
Here we explain how C. Tsallis' reply (Entropy 2021, 23(5), 630) fails to respond to points raised in (Entropy 2020, 22(10), 1110) and introduces further inconsistencies on the origin of black hole entropy. In his reply, Tsallis argues that the extensivity of thermodynamical entropy with respect to chosen variables needs to be preserved. Consequently the entropy functional is inadequate for black holes. Here we explain the undesirable consequences of this reasoning on black hole thermodynamics.
