论文标题
评论：贝尔测试由古典光学器件解释而没有量子纠缠
Comment on: Bell tests explained by classical optics without quantum entanglement
论文作者
论文摘要
在2021年《物理学》杂志上发表的一篇论文中，作者D.L. Mamas写道：“偏振光子通过光子电场的组件与偏振器相互作用，该电场与偏振器对齐。该组件随旋转偏振器旋转的角度的余弦而变化，解释了在贝尔测试数据中观察到的余弦。量子机制是不必要的，无需扮演角色。妈妈是正确的，根据这个物理模型，人们会观察到负面的余弦。但是，余弦曲线的幅度为50％，而不是100％，因此并不违反任何钟声不平等。妈妈的物理模型是经典的本地隐藏变量模型。结果用蒙特卡洛模拟说明了结果。
In a paper published in the journal Physics Essays in 2021, the author D.L. Mamas writes "A polarized photon interacts with a polarizer through the component of the photon's electric field which is aligned with the polarizer. This component varies as the cosine of the angle through which the polarizer is rotated, explaining the cosine observed in Bell test data. Quantum mechanics is unnecessary and plays no role". Mamas is right that according to this physical model, one will observe a negative cosine. However, the amplitude of the cosine curve is 50%, not 100%, and it consequently does not violate any Bell-CHSH inequality. Mamas' physical model is a classic local hidden variables model. The result is illustrated with a Monte Carlo simulation.
