论文标题
旨在测量加密货币的可追溯性
Towards Measuring the Traceability of Cryptocurrencies
论文作者
论文摘要
加密货币旨在在数字领域复制实物现金,同时删除集中且受信任的中介机构。权力下放是由区块链实现的,该区块链包含每笔交易记录的永久公共分类帐。公共分类账确保透明度,这可以使公众可验证,但会损害不可追溯性,可及性和匿名性。在过去的十年中,加密货币吸引了数百万用户,其总市值达到了大约三亿美元。但是,他们的匿名保证被广泛的错误所理解和困扰。实际上,以前关于加密货币的隐私,匿名性和可追溯性的概念是不可量化的或不适用的,例如计算上很难衡量。 在这项工作中,我们提出了一个正式的框架,以测量加密货币的(联合国)可追溯性和匿名性,使我们能够定量地推理加密货币的混合特征以及在其顶部建立的隐私增强技术。我们的方法应用了吸收的马尔可夫链与香农熵结合在一起。据我们所知,我们的工作提供了第一个实用,有效和概率的措施,以定量评估加密货币的可追溯性,这也将其推广到整个加密货币交易图。我们在几个加密货币事务图上实施并广泛评估我们提出的可追溯性度量。在其他定量结果中,我们发现在研究的一周间隔中,比特币区块链平均提供了比以太坊区块链可比但更固定的自然混合。
Cryptocurrencies aim to replicate physical cash in the digital realm while removing centralized and trusted intermediaries. Decentralization is achieved by the blockchain, a permanent public ledger that contains a record of every transaction. The public ledger ensures transparency, which enables public verifiability but harms untraceability, fungibility, and anonymity. In the last decade, cryptocurrencies attracted millions of users, with their total market cap reaching approximately three trillion USD at its peak. However, their anonymity guarantees are poorly understood and plagued by widespread misbeliefs. Indeed, previous notions of privacy, anonymity, and traceability for cryptocurrencies are either non-quantitative or inapplicable, e.g., computationally hard to measure. In this work, we put forward a formal framework to measure the (un)traceability and anonymity of cryptocurrencies, allowing us to quantitatively reason about the mixing characteristics of cryptocurrencies and the privacy-enhancing technologies built on top of them. Our methods apply absorbing Markov chains combined with Shannon entropy. To the best of our knowledge, our work provides the first practical, efficient, and probabilistic measure to assess the traceability of cryptocurrencies quantitatively, which also generalizes to entire cryptocurrency transaction graphs. We implement and extensively evaluate our proposed traceability measure on several cryptocurrency transaction graphs. Among other quantitative results, we find that in the studied one-week interval, the Bitcoin blockchain, on average, provided comparable but quantifiably more natural mixing than the Ethereum blockchain.