论文标题

超扩散星系中的DHOST重力 - 第二部分:NGC 1052-DF4和Dragonfly 44

DHOST gravity in Ultra-diffuse galaxies -- Part II: NGC 1052-DF4 and Dragonfly 44

论文作者

Laudato, Enrico, Salzano, Vincenzo

论文摘要

超扩散星系是具有相当多种特性的重力系统。一方面,我们有诸如DF2和DF4之类的案例,均由蜻蜓阵列望远镜观察到,声称在暗物质中很缺陷。另一方面,我们还观察到暗物质主导的UDG(例如DF44),估计为$ 99 \%$ dark。对于标准的暗物质范式和替代性重力理论来说,这种行为可能是一个问题。在这里,我们考虑了属于退化高阶标量张量理论家族的修改重力理论,以研究DF4和DF44的内部运动学。所选模型的特殊性是其Vaishtein筛选机制的部分破裂,它可能不仅对宇宙学,而且对天体物理量表产生影响。我们考虑两种不同的可能性:模型仅扮演黑暗能量的作用;另一个也可能模仿了一种有效的暗物质。我们得到了矛盾的结果。对于DF4,我们确认即使仅由恒星组件才能成功描述星系动力学,至少在探测的规模上,暗物质的含量很低。除此之外,我们还表明,DHOST模型与数据完全一致,并且在统计学上等同于标准的常规相​​对性暗物质情景,甚至可能取代暗物质。相反,DF44在一般相对论和我们的DHOST模型中都需要暗物质。当后者仅被视为宇宙学的暗能流体时,它在统计上是完全可靠的,并且等同于一般相对论。但是,当我们试图使用它代替暗物质时,尽管我们可以与数据相适应,但对理论参数的约束与从恒星量表中更为严格的探针得出的约束形成鲜明对比。

Ultra-Diffuse galaxies are gravitational systems with quite varied properties. On one hand we have cases like DF2 and DF4, both observed by the Dragonfly Array Telescope, claimed to be highly-deficient in dark matter. On the other hand, we have also observed dark matter dominated UDGs, such as DF44, estimated to be at $99\%$ dark. Such variety of behaviors might be a problem for both the standard dark matter paradigm and for alternative theories of gravity. Here we consider a modified gravity theory belonging to the family of Degenerate Higher-Order Scalar Tensor theories to study the internal kinematics of both DF4 and DF44. The peculiarity of the chosen model is the partial breaking of its Vaishtein screening mechanism for which it might have an influence not only on cosmological but also on astrophysical scales. We consider two different possibilities: one in which the model only plays the role of dark energy; and another one in which it might also mimic a sort of effective dark matter. We get conflicting results. For DF4 we confirm that the galaxy dynamics might be successfully described even only by a stellar component and that, at least at the scale which are probed, the content of dark matter is quite low. In addition to that, we show that the DHOST model is totally consistent with data and is statistically equivalent to a standard General Relativity dark matter scenario, and it might even replace dark matter. On the contrary, DF44 requires dark matter both in General Relativity and in our DHOST model. When the latter is considered only as a cosmological dark energy fluid, it is statistically fully reliable and equivalent to General Relativity. But when we try to use it to substitute dark matter, although we get good fits to the data, the constraints on the theoretical parameters are in sharp contrast with those derived from more stringent probes from the stellar scales.

扫码加入交流群

加入微信交流群

微信交流群二维码

扫码加入学术交流群,获取更多资源