论文标题
通过运动学原理测试宇宙原理的理论系统学
Theoretical systematics in testing the Cosmological Principle with the kinematic quasar dipole
论文作者
论文摘要
宇宙学原理是支撑宇宙标准模型的基础的一部分。在精确宇宙学的时代,当标准模型的压力测试发现各种紧张局势和可能的异常时,检查该原理的生存能力至关重要。一个关键测试是宇宙微波背景的运动学偶极子与大规模物质分布之间的一致性。使用无线电连续体和类星体样品的结果表明,在两个偶极子的方向上达成了粗略的一致性,但比物质偶极子的预期幅度大。在某些情况下估计与辐射偶极子的张力估计为$ \ sim5σ$,这表明潜在的新宇宙张力和可能违反了CP。但是,在来源的二维投影中预测偶极子的标准形式主义忽略了光度函数中可能的进化效应。实际上,对于正确投影三维源分布,必须来自光度函数的径向信息。使用类星体光度函数的各种当前模型,我们表明忽略红移进化可以显着高估相对速度幅度。尽管我们研究的模型彼此相一致,并且与当前数据一致,但取决于这些偶极子的偶极子(取决于光度函数的衍生物)可能会不同意超过$3σ$。在对新的宇宙张力得出强大的结论之前,需要解决这种理论上的系统偏见。
The Cosmological Principle is part of the foundation that underpins the standard model of the Universe. In the era of precision cosmology, when stress tests of the standard model are uncovering various tensions and possible anomalies, it is critical to check the viability of this principle. A key test is the consistency between the kinematic dipoles of the cosmic microwave background and of the large-scale matter distribution. Results using radio continuum and quasar samples indicate a rough agreement in the directions of the two dipoles, but a larger than expected amplitude of the matter dipole. The resulting tension with the radiation dipole has been estimated at $\sim 5σ$ for some cases, suggesting a potential new cosmological tension and a possible violation of the CP. However, the standard formalism for predicting the dipole in the two-dimensional projection of sources overlooks possible evolution effects in the luminosity function. In fact, radial information from the luminosity function is necessary for a correct projection of the three-dimensional source distribution. Using a variety of current models of the quasar luminosity function, we show that neglecting redshift evolution can significantly overestimate the relative velocity amplitude. While the models we investigate are consistent with each other and with current data, the dipole derived from these, which depends on derivatives of the luminosity function, can disagree by more than $3σ$. This theoretical systematic bias needs to be resolved before robust conclusions can be made about a new cosmic tension.