论文标题
超越丰富度:使用Dimodels R包装的物种身份,均匀度,丰富度和物种相互作用来建模BEF关系
Going beyond richness: Modelling the BEF relationship using species identity, evenness, richness and species interactions via the DImodels R package
论文作者
论文摘要
BEF研究旨在了解生态系统如何应对物种多样性的梯度。多样性相互作用(DI)模型适合分析BEF关系。这些模型将社区的生态系统功能响应与社区中物种的身份,它们的均匀性(比例)和相互作用有关。社区中的物种数量(丰富)也通过这种方法隐式建模。在BEF研究中,很常见的是将生态系统功能建模为丰富度的函数。尽管这可以揭示BEF关系中的趋势,但根据定义,物种多样性比单独的丰富度更广泛,而BEF关系中的重要模式可能仍然隐藏。在本文中,我们介绍了用于实现DI模型的Dimodels R软件包。我们还将DI模型与传统建模方法进行了比较,以突出使用物种多样性的多维定义的优势。我们表明,使用DI模型可以使模型的拟合度高于其他方法。它通过由于物种多样性的多个方面而纳入变化来做到这一点。从DI模型预测不限于研究设计点,该模型可以推断以预测任何物种组成和比例(假设研究设计中该空间足够覆盖)。单独表达BEF关系作为丰富度的函数对于捕获整体趋势可能是有用的。但是,将物种多样性的多个维度崩溃到单个维度(例如丰富度)可能会导致有价值的生态信息丢失。 DI建模提供了一个框架来测试BEF关系中物种多样性的多个组成部分。它有助于发现对BEF关系的更深入的生态理解,并可能导致推断。
BEF studies aim to understand how ecosystems respond to a gradient of species diversity. Diversity-Interactions (DI) models are suitable for analysing the BEF relationship. These models relate an ecosystem function response of a community to the identity of the species in the community, their evenness (proportions) and interactions. The number of species in the community (richness) is also implicitly modelled through this approach. It is common in BEF studies to model an ecosystem function as a function of richness; while this can uncover trends in the BEF relationship, by definition, species diversity is much broader than richness alone, and important patterns in the BEF relationship may remain hidden. In this paper, we introduce the DImodels R package for implementing DI models. We also compare DI models to traditional modelling approaches to highlight the advantages of using a multi-dimensional definition of species diversity. We show that using DI models can lead to considerably improved model fit over other methods; it does this by incorporating variation due to the multiple facets of species diversity. Predicting from a DI model is not limited to the study design points, the model can extrapolate to predict for any species composition and proportions (assuming there is sufficient coverage of this space in the study design). Expressing the BEF relationship as a function of richness alone can be useful to capture overall trends. However, collapsing the multiple dimensions of species diversity to a single dimension (such as richness) can result in valuable ecological information being lost. DI modelling provides a framework to test the multiple components of species diversity in the BEF relationship. It facilitates uncovering a deeper ecological understanding of the BEF relationship and can lead to enhanced inference.