论文标题
将非标准的相互作用和洛伦兹的不变性违反在PROTVINO中与超级敌人实验
Distinguishing Non-Standard Interaction and Lorentz Invariance Violation at Protvino to Super-ORCA experiment
论文作者
论文摘要
作为两种现象,中微子传播中的非标准相互作用(NSI)和洛伦兹不变性违规(LIV)以类似的方式修饰了中微子振荡的哈密顿量,很难区分这两种效果。它们之间的唯一区别在于,NSI取决于物质密度,而LIV独立于地球物质效应。因此,对于固定基线实验,物质密度是恒定的,描述NSI和LIV的理论是完全等效的。但是,由于NSI和LIV参数的当前和未来界限不是等效的,因此可以根据这些参数的当前和未来界限,在长基线中微子实验中区分这两种情况。在本文中,我们试图在沙丘和P2SO的背景下区分LIV和NSI,因为这两个未来的实验被认为对最强的物质效应敏感,并且具有很大的统计数据。从理论上讲,在数据和NSI中占据了LIV,我们的结果表明,确实可以在LIV和NSI之间有良好的歧视。 LIV和NSI之间的最佳分离为$3σ$ c.l.使用P2SO实现参数$ a_ {μμ} $。在这种情况下,如果人们考虑了由本实验约束的NSI参数值,则可能在其未来的界限内进行分离的LIV参数值。在沙丘和P2SO之间,后者对这种歧视具有更好的敏感性。
As the two phenomena, non-standard interaction (NSI) in neutrino propagation and Lorentz invariance violation (LIV) modify the Hamiltonian of neutrino oscillation in a similar fashion, it is very difficult to distinguish these two effects. The only difference between them lies in the fact that NSI depends on the matter density, whereas LIV is independent of the earth matter effect. Therefore for a fixed baseline experiment, where matter density is constant, the theories describing NSI and LIV are exactly equivalent. However, as the present and future bounds of the NSI and LIV parameters are not equivalent, one can distinguish these two scenarios in the long-baseline neutrino experiments depending on their statistics with respect to the present and future bounds of these parameters. In this paper, we attempt to differentiate between LIV and NSI in the context of DUNE and P2SO, as these two future experiments are believed to be sensitive to the strongest matter effect and will have very large statistics. Taking LIV in the data and NSI in theory, our results show that, indeed it is possible to have good discrimination between LIV and NSI. The best separation between LIV and NSI at $3 σ$ C.L. is achieved for the parameter $a_{μμ}$ with P2SO. In this case, the value of LIV parameter for which separation is possible, lies within its future bound, if one considers the value of NSI parameter to be constrained by the present experiments. Between DUNE and P2SO, the latter has better sensitivity for such discrimination.